I am wondering whether quadratic (or exponential) taxes could help. They would put a penalty on big business but favor small and medium businesses. If big business is not profitable anymore the three problems of central planning, subsidies and requisition of surpluses should be solved by the invisible hand of the market.
Drawing an analogy from biology; private equity is like a parasite or perhaps a tumour in the body of the economy. It subverts the flow of nutrients (capital) away from healthy tissues ( productive companies) and seeks only its own growth ( funds under management) rather than the improvements of society as a whole. Perhaps surgery, or an enema, is required?
I am not so sure that Mark Twain’s comment about ‘land’ holds true today. It was made before the era of the ubiquitous multi-storey building in our urban landscape. Land has a tripartite character: a) as a living substrate on which primary production occurs, b) as a horizontal surface on which all other production and service activities are conducted, c) as a store of wealth, a surrogate for money.
Land is valued in accordance with which of those attributes is most significant. Developers seek to use ( and stretch) society’s land use planning rules to change land’s role from (a)to (b) and place as many storeys as possible on it to generate (c). In this way they actually create more floor space, effectively more ‘land’. Multi-storey development multiplies the quantity of ‘land’ and the wealth that rent seekers can collect from it.
Private Equity as Public Debt
Big capitalists love communism. I thought that we all knew this?
Anyway can you come and get your troll thanks.
https://councilestatemedia.substack.com/p/the-working-class-is-not-going-to/comment/40487571
I am wondering whether quadratic (or exponential) taxes could help. They would put a penalty on big business but favor small and medium businesses. If big business is not profitable anymore the three problems of central planning, subsidies and requisition of surpluses should be solved by the invisible hand of the market.
The text employs a clever and subtle shift from the (supposedly benevolent) "invisible hand" to the (corrupt and rent-extracting) "invisible hands".
Drawing an analogy from biology; private equity is like a parasite or perhaps a tumour in the body of the economy. It subverts the flow of nutrients (capital) away from healthy tissues ( productive companies) and seeks only its own growth ( funds under management) rather than the improvements of society as a whole. Perhaps surgery, or an enema, is required?
I am not so sure that Mark Twain’s comment about ‘land’ holds true today. It was made before the era of the ubiquitous multi-storey building in our urban landscape. Land has a tripartite character: a) as a living substrate on which primary production occurs, b) as a horizontal surface on which all other production and service activities are conducted, c) as a store of wealth, a surrogate for money.
Land is valued in accordance with which of those attributes is most significant. Developers seek to use ( and stretch) society’s land use planning rules to change land’s role from (a)to (b) and place as many storeys as possible on it to generate (c). In this way they actually create more floor space, effectively more ‘land’. Multi-storey development multiplies the quantity of ‘land’ and the wealth that rent seekers can collect from it.
Funny you mentioned Toys R US. Came to my mind too as a victim of an LB.