Germany is in turmoil over natural gas supplies and prices and the closure of the Nord Stream 1 pipeline - a pipeline transferring natural gas (a fossil fuel) from Russia to Germany.
I have just returned from there, and a visit to, amongst other landmarks, the extension to Berlin’s German Historical Museum, designed by star architect I. M. Pei.
The museum is staging a startling and revealing exhibition of photographs of ex-Chancellor Angela Merkel taken over the years 1991 - 2021.
For all her weaknesses and policy failures - and some were disastrous - Chancellor Merkel never succumbed to the siren voices of Big Money. The same cannot be said for another ex-Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, who remains, as far I can ascertain, as chairman of Nord Stream AG’s shareholders committee. He is in a strong position to defend the interests of his country, but appears to prefer protecting the interests of fossil fuel producers and the Russian state.
Back in mid-July I argued that
Prices of commodities in [energy] markets are determined by speculators on Wall St and and at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange – not by politicians in Riyadh or Moscow. Not by the CEOs of global oil companies like BP or EXXON.
Not even by rising demand.
This last week German commentators have competed to attack President Putin for his conduct of “economic warfare” with the decision to shut down Nord Stream 1 - “for maintenance” reasons.
President Putin is accused of “blackmailing” the EU and Germany in particular. [Before proceeding, I want to make clear: my views are not in defence of, or in anyway an endorsement of President Putin’s authoritarian actions at home or his military or economic war-mongering internationally.]
But now the debate has taken a new turn. Prof. Lion Hirth, a director of Neon “sustainable energy systems and power markets” - commented today, with some apparent satisfaction:
The logic here is inverted. If Russia is blackmailing Germany, “weaponising energy” by closing down the pipeline - then surely the price would have risen, not ‘evaporated’? Is that not Putin’s rationale for further “maintenance” (of an already excessively well maintained) Nord Stream 1? It must be surely, because Russia’s Gazprom, according to the Economist, stands to lose between $203m and $228m for every day the Nord Stream is shut down.
But contrary to expectations the natural gas price has not risen at this suspension of supplies.
Instead the price has fallen.
Has the price fallen because as Prof. Hirth suggests “the market” - newly anthropomorphised - “doesn’t care” about his blackmail? Or is that Russia is too ignorant to understand that, contrary to the laws of supply and demand, lowering the supply of natural gas to Germany lowers the price rather than hiking it? Is that what Prof. Hirth is suggesting?
Holgar Zschaepitz is a little more cautious than Prof. Hirth.
Truly the right question: do these prices reflect real scarcities? Are they meaningful?
And of course they are not…
Having said that, it is clear that Germany is urgently and wisely building natural gas inventories - with its target of gas inventories nearly 80% full. But this build-up in inventories - i.e. an increase in locally available supplies - has not had an impact on the global price, which cares little for Germany’s prudence. As ICIS, the Independent Commodity Intelligence Services company explains:
…..increased interdependence between US LNG production, Europe and the LNG markets in Asia the TTF gas benchmark has become more interconnected as a global gas index.
Despite shifts in supplies of natural gas, the global gas price remains at a 14-year high of $10/MMBtu- as this chart from Trading Economics shows:
There may be one positive to emerge from these high prices and this halt to Natural Gas Flows via Nord Stream 1.
It may be this.
Twenty seven years after the first UN COP meeting in Berlin in 1995; and seven years after the historic Paris Agreement - a legally binding international treaty on climate change adopted by Germany at COP 21 and entered into force on 4 November 2016 - greenhouse gasses are still rising.
Far from emissions falling (in the fantasy ‘net zero’ world created by Big Money) the world has got hotter, much hotter since those empty promises were made in first, Berlin and then Paris seven years ago. ….
Pakistan’s cataclysm is a consequence.
Will that cataclysm motivate western politicians to act urgently to slash demand for, and the supply of, fossil fuels and their emissions?
Maybe high gas prices and Putin’s closure of Nord Stream 1 is just the kick up the backside needed to ensure Europe’s politicians finally begin to act; to scale back on the consumption of goods and services fuelled by fossil energy; to end fossil fuel subsidies and dependence on the autocrats in control of the world’s fossil energy supplies - and to transition to cleaner energies..?
If and when they do - it will be far too late to save the homes, livelihoods and lives of 33 million Pakistanis.
The US-NATO-UK Ukrainian Proxy War on Russia is an existential war of survival, for Russia. The West as well. It is now a Zero Sum Game Conflict. American political and economic goals are to destroy the Russian state, apply regime change strategies and steal Russia's vast natural resources.
This campaign comes as the culmination of several hundred years of Western global dominance, not by the superiority of Western ideas and values, of which we hear much, but rather by The West's superiority in applying organized violence, mass murder and resource theft, notably against technologically inferior states. It thus is a test of The West's dominant Geo-Political and Geo-Economic Success Paradigm. Russia is not a technologically inferior state.
The Ukrainian people are entirely expendable cannon fodder for this campaign and they are the modern equivalent of a Pyramid of Skulls.
https://les7eb.substack.com/p/ukraine-long-proxy-war-vi-god-favours
God Favours Russia.
___________________
Washington-London Systems Managers attribute the destruction of Nord Stream to Russia.
Joe Biden made it clear that they would stop it.
Nord Stream has been a long standing concern for American energy interests.
When one commits a crime, one invariably assigns blame elsewhere.
A have the Washington-London Systems Managers.
Others believe this.
No greater and tangible evidence of The Greater Fool Theory than this.
And now Gazprom (Russia) is in trouble as Vladimir Milov pointed out
https://twitter.com/v_milov/status/1565747327628967939?s=20&t=U4p2sMD1q6KwquLpITzVrg
The attempt to disrupt European gas storage has failed.... but Russia has to move that gas has to be moved somewhere and now that flow has stopped for them too. So they can store but then?